THE NOLANIAD vs ODYSSEY (2026 vs 2k) comaprison More arcitles included
When Nolan Meets Homer and the Bones Rattle
After a week of waiting, I finally managed to find a day to go see the film with my wife. And now, dear readers, I will take you step by step through Christopher Nolan's Odyssey — a film that, if Homer had heard it, I'm certain his bones would be rattling in his grave.
THE OPENING – When Nolan Decides to Become Homer
The film opens with an African-American character striking a rod against the ground, accompanied by Nolan's own text layered over the Odyssey — vaguely reminiscent of the opening of the Iliad. I found this completely misplaced. If Homer were alive, he would have already filed a lawsuit for aesthetic trespassing.
Then we see the Trojan Horse floating in the sea, with Greek soldiers hidden inside the wooden furniture. Here, we're fine — at least the horse had the correct anatomy.
The Greeks open the gates and the rest of the warriors pour in... No comment. Let's move on.
THE ISLANDS – From Polyphemus to the Giants of... Questionable Origin
1. The Cave of Polyphemus
The heroes arrive at the cave of the famous Cyclops. Here there is a notable absence: Nobody. In the older film, this element existed — it was, shall we say, the joke of the whole affair. Here, Polyphemus was more savage, a beast of no gender and hero from SEAsia , devouring one of the soldiers right in front of their eyes with his teeth. A bit excessive, but fine — Nolan wanted to show he wasn't messing around.
2. The Island of the Small Giants (Laestrygonians)
Next, they arrive at another island where there were small giants in iron armor. In Homer's text it is notes as human eating 'goliaths' — Nolan probably pulled them out of his imagination,
3. Circe – Witch or Village Woman?
Circe here resembles more of a village woman with magical abilities to transform people into animals, depending on how they treated her. In the older film, this element existed but didn't show the process. Here, Odysseus only realizes what's happening when he kills one of the so calm animals and it transforms back into a human. Interesting moment with possibly closer to Hommer , but it came a little late.
4. Scylla, Charybdis, and the Sirens – Nothing Special
Compared to Asante's film, Scylla and Charybdis were just... bored.
The sirens idd exist in Assante, the story is here near exact to the ode . good for nolan
CALYPSO – When You Forget Your Former Life
Throughout the film, we see conversations between Calypso and Odysseus, who recounts his story until, at some point, he forgets his former life eating a lotus offered by her. Here we also have the inclusion of the Lotus-Eaters — something that existed in Homer but not in Asante's film. According to Homer and Asante, Hermes forces Calypso to release Odysseus. This never happened here. Calypso simply says "leave" and Odysseus leaves. Just like that.
This could be the real Helen of the story — as brilliant as Naomi in the older version.
ITHACA – The Old Man Who... Remained Young
In Homer and Asante, Odysseus ages during his return. Here, Matt Damon remains relatively old — over 50 — while in reality Odysseus was supposed to age upon his return. Nolan ignored this element, perhaps because Damon didn't want to age that quickly.
THE BATTLE – Fewer Deaths, More Arrows
The battle after the bow demonstration: in Asante's film, Odysseus killed all the suitors. Here, Odysseus only managed to kill a few, while some wounded him with arrows. Perhaps Nolan wanted to make the film more realistic — or he just got bored 'killing' so many people.
The film closes with a hymn echoing its opening, as if to remind the viewer where it all began. Nolan likely strayed from the mythology and started inserting his own ideas, showing Odysseus engaging in self-criticism about the Greeks' behavior at Troy. As the Bronze Age ends, the Age of Nolan begins.
THE CAST – Laughter, Laughter, and More Laughter
Let's talk about the casting. It was, to put it mildly, laughable.
Helen: A Black actress with a birthmark on her left cheek. And a stripe on her cheekbone. As if Nolan chose his actors from TikTok.
The Rest: A handful of Asian and African actors among the remaining people — as if Nolan decided to create a multicultural corporation instead of a period epic.
Zendaya as Athena: A small role, more philosophical, but Zendaya simply... didn't fit. Athena, from what I know, was a redhead possibly due to the role of Roselini . Not that you have to be a redhead, but it helps when the goddess of wisdom has a look that says "I know something you don't." Here, she just looked bored.
The weight of the film falls on Matt Damon (Odysseus), who was genuinely good. He held the film upright, much like Odysseus held his bow. On the same level as Assante. It's worth noting that Damon in most parts of the movie is quite depressive, while Assante is clearly more sly but very sharp-minded, as in the original.
Among the supporting roles, Telemachus stood out, along with Anne Hathaway in a forty-something role. Hathaway, at least, managed to project a dignity that was otherwise absent from the rest of the cast — possibly better than in the previous movie.
THE VISUAL EFFECTS – A Few but Very Real
The movie is an impressive production, with effects that are very real (but only a few, as in Scylla or Polyphemus).
COMPARISON WITH ASANTE – Who Wins?
Comparison with Asante's film. There, Homer was more faithfully and impressively adapted — here, Nolan simply... improvised. And when you improvise on one of humanity's greatest epics, Homer's bones rattle. This is the reason I call this movie The Nolaniad.
MY VERDICT – 6/9/10 as a Performance
Based on Asante's film, this one gets 6/9 as a performance. It's an impressive production, but the deviation from Homer is so significant that it loses its meaning.
It remains a film worth watching — but only if you haven't read Homer. If you have, you'll leave wondering, "Why?"
Matt Damon is excellent. Anne Hathaway is more than decent. Zendaya is just... there. Everyone else is... different. If you enjoy Nolan's films, you'll appreciate it. If you love Homer, you'll leave with a headache.
Blog Title: When My Friend Mike Tried to Read Our Odyssey Script
I sent the draft of our Odyssey project to my friend Mike in Australia. The script compares Homer’s epic, Christopher Nolan’s cinematic vision, and our own wild additions featuring Lucy and AI.
Here is Mike’s brutally honest (and hilarious) live reaction as he tried to navigate the story:
On the Confusion: "Trying to deal with this Homer story I feel like a blind man trying to navigate a dark tunnel with no lighting..."
On Nolan’s Plot Mergers: "What the hell is the merger with Calypso's Island...?"
On Circe's Chapter: "This is a crazy bit I do not understand at all, now I am quickly losing interest and becoming extremely bored!!!!!!"
On the Chapter Jump: "I lost the plot of the story well before reaching this stage and then, how the f did we get from 11 to 20 all of a sudden?"*
His Final Verdict: "Zach, I give up! But it seems Lucy's way of dealing with things is certainly superior to Nolan's. AI appears to have it done and dusted... AI should re-write the whole story!"
Critical Consensus of Disappointment
After analyzing over 20 user reviews on IMDb that rated the film 2/10, a clear picture emerges of why Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey has become one of his most divisive films. The criticisms cluster around several key themes, each revealing a different facet of audience dissatisfaction.
THE CASTING CONTROVERSY
The most frequent and passionate complaint revolves around the film's casting choices. Reviewers consistently express bewilderment at the diverse casting for a story rooted in ancient Greek mythology.
One reviewer captures the sentiment: "If you're adapting one of the most important works of ancient Greek literature, why not respect the culture it comes from?" Another states bluntly: "The characters in The Odyssey are Greeks from Bronze Age Greece, yet the film seems more interested in making a contemporary statement than faithfully representing the people."
The casting of Helen of Troy draws particular ire: "Changing the appearance of such a central character completely pulled me out of the story." A reviewer notes that in the older film, Helen was portrayed as "the most beautiful of all Odyssey adaptations," while Nolan's version features a Black actress with visible facial scars. Many frame this as part of a "larger trend where accuracy seems secondary to ticking boxes."
The celebrity-heavy casting is also seen as a marketing ploy: "It's a celebrity casting for awards, for sales. They knew they had a bad movie, so they used 'hey look famous people' to get you to pay for it." Zendaya's Athena is repeatedly described as "a small role, more philosophical, but she just didn't fit," with one reviewer noting that Athena was "supposed to be a redhead."
THE SCRIPT AND WRITING
The screenplay receives near-universal condemnation for its dialogue, pacing, and handling of the source material.
"The dialogue is horribly written," writes one reviewer. Another comments: "Repeatedly we're told things instead of being shown them." A particularly harsh critique calls the film "bloated, self-important slog that turns Homer's timeless epic into Nolan's latest pretentious puzzle box."
The pacing is consistently described as problematic: "The story never fully drew me in, the pacing often felt slow." Another reviewer notes: "It goes so slow then jumps as if I started watching a movie from the middle then goes back to being so slow you get bored to the extreme." A viewer who walked out after an hour describes the film as "so boring that we walked out."
THE DEVIATION FROM HOMER
Perhaps the most significant criticism is the film's departure from the original epic. Reviewers who know the source material express deep frustration.
One reviewer offers a sophisticated analysis: "In Homer, each island is an offer to stop being human. Forgetting, animality, total knowledge, immortality. Odysseus refuses each one and chooses to stay mortal among mortals. That chain of refusals is the journey. Nolan filmed them as obstacles to get past. An obstacle makes an adventure. A refusal makes an epic."
The treatment of Calypso exemplifies this: "Homer's Calypso is a jailer. Odysseus weeps on the shore for seven years and is freed only when Zeus orders it... Nolan's Calypso is a healer who gives him the lotus to ease his war trauma and lets him leave willingly. When the jailer opens the door herself, there is no choice left to make."
The omission of key elements is frequently mentioned: "Leaving out the bag of winds? How do you do that?" "Nolan's choice to omit 'nobody' name fooling Polyphemus was pure ego." "The cunning that makes Odysseus was totally gone."
One reviewer sums it up: "You don't take a masterpiece that has survived 3000 years and reshape it into a Hollywood story. If you're going to adapt it, keep the wisdom behind it."
THE PRODUCTION AND VISUALS
Despite the negative reception, the visuals are almost universally praised.
"Visually, the movie is stunning. The cinematography, locations, costumes, and production design are all excellent." Another echoes: "It looks incredible. The way the film was shot is gorgeous and the CGI and visual scenes are absolutely top tier."
However, even the praise comes with caveats: "Great visuals alone are not enough." "Spectacular visuals can't compensate for choices that disconnect the story from its roots."
The Trojan Horse sequence draws particular criticism: "95% of the details given the budget of this movie could be 1000 times better." One reviewer ridicules the design: "How did anyone come up with the absurd idea of building the horse in such a way that half the men inside would have to drown miserably when it's standing in water?"
THE SOUND MIX
A recurring, surprising complaint involves the film's sound design.
One reviewer states: "A huge fail for Nolan. As director, I assume he was in charge of the sound mix. It was so loud in the action scenes that people in the audience were putting their fingers in their ears." Another calls it: "The torturously dark super bass-heavy score that seems like it's trying to rupture ear drums."
The soundtrack is described as "the worst soundtrack of all his films," with one reviewer lamenting: "I still frequently play the Dark Knight, Interstellar and Oppenheimer OST. I hoped for a bigger than life epic."
THE PERFORMANCES
While Matt Damon receives some praise, the ensemble cast is largely criticized.
"The weight of the film falls on Matt Damon, who was genuinely good." However, another disagrees: "There was no feeling attached to Damon's portrayal of Odysseus—we didn't feel his longing to be home, how hard the travails were psychologically."
Anne Hathaway's performance is singled out for harsh criticism: "Anne Hathaway does not have the acting skills for this role. She over-acted in almost every scene... she alone cracks the film like an egg." Another notes her Penelope feels "far too subdued, soft-spoken, and weak for a woman who should be cunning, resilient."
The supporting cast is described as: "Old and new gen of actors trying to act Human. I found myself not caring about anyone. The acting and dialogue were bland, and every character was irritating."
SPECIFIC SCENE CRITICISMS
Several specific scenes draw particular ire:
Polyphemus: "The Cyclops? Reduced to a dimly lit cave brawl that feels like leftover Batman footage." Another notes: "He sees a fire in his cave, doesn't say a word or emote anything, eats a couple of men, and goes to sleep... Totally rushed."
The Underworld: "Plenty of time for watching ram's blood being offered at Hades. Hades? I mean the shore of a beach where actual bodies rise up to oversees. How do you make that choice?"
Circe's Island: "Circe's island? A half-hearted pig transformation scene that Samantha Morton tries valiantly to salvage, but even she can't overcome the wooden dialogue."
HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ACCURACY
Several reviewers express frustration with historical inaccuracies:
"The armor looks like generic Hollywood 'ancient warrior' costuming despite the incredible Bronze Age Mycenaean designs they could have drawn from."
"Trojans and Acheous were Greeks - it was a civil war!"
"How is that tiny figure a great warrior, much less the greatest warrior, just because he sacrificed his life, like the other thousands?"
THE PERSONAL DISAPPOINTMENT
Many reviewers express personal disappointment as Nolan fans:
"I went into this film with very high expectations because I have always admired Christopher Nolan's work. Unfortunately, this was one of his weakest films in my opinion."
"Normally a huge Nolan fan but this was a hard watch."
"I wanted to love this, but couldn't."
One reviewer captures the sentiment perfectly: "Even the great Nolan has succumbed to monster hubris."
THE COMPARISON TO OTHER ADAPTATIONS
Multiple reviewers point to older adaptations as superior:
"Even the low budget TV series 'The Odyssey' (1997) told this story better."
"Go watch Troy from 2004 and pretend this movie doesn't exist."
"Yea... I think the 90s version was better."
THE FINAL VERDICT
The collective voice of these 2/10 reviews paints a picture of a visually spectacular but fundamentally misguided adaptation. As one reviewer concludes: "Homer wrote an epic. Nolan created an impressive spectacle. As a movie, it works. As The Odyssey, it doesn't."
Another reviewer sums up the experience: "This is part of a larger trend where accuracy seems secondary to ticking boxes. Greek mythology isn't generic fantasy; it's a cornerstone of Greek cultural heritage. It deserves the same level of respect and authenticity that filmmakers would give to the myths, legends, and history of any other civilization."
The most devastating assessment comes from a viewer who writes: "Every station is here in the right order. But sequence is not meaning."
Document compiled based on external critical reviews cataloged on IMDb for The Odyssey (2026).
Comments
Post a Comment