Articles and reviews from Zach

screenshot from the i mdb page    This was a very good anf a bit traumatic experience after 13 years to watch the sequel Good as it was a case of a sudden but ad dur to several budgetary and watching reasons . first let me focus on the bad reasons   and skipping the budgetary. The movie has been watched in   a regional city with   only one multiplex cinema with   small halls and quite low illumination. The Dolby glasses were very dirty. Cleaning them helped very little . watching was   relatively difficult and required frequent glass   removals   to calm my   eyes.     Now the good:   as with the previous story this story is hugely   CGI   based though it was also ‘filmed’ in the sea, possibly New Zeraland   as noticed by other reviewers or in the trivia. Landscapes nicer than in the first installment   and thereewier copes into a totally new underground world. There is still some negative as most of the movie is near 2D that can be watched without glasses even partially… Mor

    from https://abstractaf.in It’s the last movie I seen this period in Netlfix after long pause and was quite enthused with it. The movie is a kind of the typical King Kong merchandise   the Nordic way where they believe in vey tall humanoid creatures     of the very past centuries which were in limbo. This 40+ meter creature ,possibly taller than you typical King Kong  wakes up after many centuries being in limbo looking for revenge for the death of his breed destroying everything he passes except humans. in   contrast there was a nice touching point with him preserving a young girl before part of a building was fallen into her. A very fast paced movie with lots of action The fun with the trolling are the many obvious ‘flawed’ scenes some of them with deep wholes! I cant call them out here it but I am sure that the movie was designed to troll anyone with its flaws, otherwise it could not intrigue anyone in “putting his /her mud over that”   as we say in Greece     .   that means